Envy

Mary Lamb's Envy

Introduction

Mary Lamb's poem "Envy" presents a deceptively simple allegory that, upon closer examination, reveals a complex interplay of botanical imagery, human psychology, and moral philosophy. This early 19th-century work, though often overshadowed by the more famous collaborative efforts of Mary and her brother Charles Lamb, deserves critical attention for its subtle exploration of contentment, self-acceptance, and the destructive nature of envy. Through a careful analysis of the poem's structure, imagery, and thematic elements, we can uncover the layers of meaning embedded within Lamb's expertly crafted verses.

Structure and Form

The poem consists of three six-line stanzas, each following a consistent rhyme scheme of AABCCB. This structure, reminiscent of the ballad form, lends the poem a lyrical quality that belies its philosophical depth. The regularity of the meter, primarily iambic tetrameter interspersed with iambic trimeter lines, creates a rhythmic stability that mirrors the natural order described in the poem. This formal consistency serves as a counterpoint to the disruptive force of envy that the poem cautions against.

Lamb's choice of this structured form is particularly significant when considering the poem's content. The rigid structure can be seen as a metaphor for the inherent nature or "natural bent" of beings, whether plants or people. Just as the rose-tree cannot change its fundamental structure, so too are individuals bound by their innate characteristics. However, this limitation is presented not as a constraint but as a source of beauty and uniqueness.

Imagery and Symbolism

The central metaphor of the rose-tree serves as the poem's organizing principle. Lamb personifies the tree, imbuing it with the capacity for discontent and desire for change. This anthropomorphism allows her to draw clear parallels between the natural world and human psychology, a technique that resonates with the Romantic sensibilities of her era.

The choice of the rose-tree as the primary symbol is particularly apt. Roses have long been associated with beauty, love, and passion in Western literature. By focusing on this traditionally revered flower, Lamb subverts expectations, suggesting that even the most admired entities might fall prey to envy and discontent.

The other flowers mentioned—"violet blue," "lily fair," and "sweet mignionet" (mignonette)—each carry their own symbolic weight. The violet, often associated with modesty and humility, stands in contrast to the more ostentatious rose. The lily, symbolizing purity and majesty, represents a different kind of beauty. The mignonette, less common in poetry, is known for its sweet fragrance rather than its visual appeal, adding a sensory dimension to the poem's exploration of beauty and worth.

These diverse flowers serve to illustrate the variety of "talents" or qualities that individuals might possess. By emphasizing their distinctiveness, Lamb reinforces the futility and inappropriateness of envying traits that are fundamentally incompatible with one's nature.

Thematic Analysis

At its core, "Envy" is a meditation on the nature of contentment and the perils of covetousness. The poem posits that true satisfaction comes from recognizing and appreciating one's inherent qualities rather than yearning for attributes that are fundamentally alien to one's nature.

The first stanza establishes the premise that each entity has its own unique characteristics and capabilities. The repetition of "nor" emphasizes the rose-tree's inability to produce other types of flowers, setting up the central conflict of the poem. The use of "natural bent" in this stanza is particularly significant, echoing philosophical discussions about innate tendencies versus external influences.

The second stanza introduces the concept of ingratitude, suggesting that envy often stems from a failure to appreciate one's own gifts. The sensory imagery of the rose's scent after a "gentle shower" evokes a sense of natural harmony and beauty, contrasting sharply with the discontentment that envy breeds. This stanza also hints at the self-destructive nature of envy, as the tree's hypothetical discontent would negate its ability to perceive its own beauty.

The final stanza broadens the scope from the specific allegory to a general statement about human nature. The comparison of envious persons to a "blind and senseless tree" is a harsh indictment of those who fail to recognize their own worth. However, the poem ends on a hopeful note, suggesting that self-reflection and personal growth ("care and culture") can lead to the discovery of one's unique talents.

Literary and Historical Context

"Envy" can be situated within the broader context of Romantic poetry, which often explored the relationship between nature and human emotion. However, Lamb's approach is distinct from that of her more famous contemporaries. While poets like Wordsworth and Coleridge often used nature as a mirror for human consciousness or a source of spiritual revelation, Lamb employs nature as a vehicle for moral instruction.

The poem also reflects the moral and didactic concerns of children's literature in the early 19th century. Mary Lamb, along with her brother Charles, was known for their contributions to this genre, particularly their "Tales from Shakespeare." "Envy," with its clear moral lesson and accessible imagery, could be seen as an extension of this pedagogical approach to literature.

Furthermore, the poem can be read in the context of Mary Lamb's personal struggles with mental health and societal expectations. The emphasis on self-acceptance and the recognition of one's unique talents may reflect Lamb's own journey toward self-understanding and validation in a society that often marginalized those with mental illness.

Linguistic and Stylistic Elements

Lamb's language in "Envy" is deceptively simple, employing common words and straightforward syntax. This accessibility, however, belies the poem's philosophical depth. The use of conditional phrases ("if this tree were discontent," "should it fret") creates a hypothetical scenario that invites the reader to engage in the moral reasoning at the heart of the poem.

The repetition of key phrases, such as "natural bent" and "discontent," reinforces the central themes and creates a sense of urgency around the poem's moral message. The shift from the specific example of the rose-tree to the general statement about "all envious persons" in the final stanza demonstrates Lamb's skill in moving from the particular to the universal, a hallmark of effective allegorical writing.

Conclusion

Mary Lamb's "Envy" stands as a testament to the power of allegorical poetry to convey complex philosophical ideas through accessible imagery and language. By interweaving botanical metaphors with keen psychological insight, Lamb creates a work that is at once a gentle moral lesson and a profound meditation on the nature of contentment and self-actualization.

The poem's enduring relevance lies in its nuanced exploration of envy, a universal human experience. Lamb does not simply condemn envy but seeks to understand its roots in self-doubt and lack of self-awareness. By offering the possibility of discovering one's own "pretty flower" or "talent that is rare," the poem ultimately presents a hopeful vision of human potential.

In its fusion of natural imagery, moral philosophy, and psychological insight, "Envy" exemplifies the best qualities of Romantic-era didactic poetry. It invites multiple readings and interpretations, rewarding close analysis with ever-deeper layers of meaning. As such, it deserves a place alongside more celebrated works of the period, offering modern readers both aesthetic pleasure and timeless wisdom.