Peer Editing

Education
Pronunciation

Understanding ARPABET Pronunciation

Want to hear it? Click the Listen button to hear the browser speak the word using text-to-speech!

The pronunciation guide uses the ARPABET phonetic system—the same system used in speech recognition and text-to-speech applications.

Vowel Examples:
AE1 = cat, bat
EH1 = bed, head
IY1 = see, me
OW1 = go, boat
UW1 = boot, do
Stress Numbers:
0 = no stress (unstressed)
1 = primary stress (loud)
2 = secondary stress (medium)
Example:
AH0 TH IY1 N AH0
= a-THEE-na (Athena)

The stressed syllable (marked with 1) is pronounced louder and clearer than others.

Quick Definition

A collaborative process in which writers read and respond to one another’s drafts. It helps poets identify strengths, confusing passages, and possibilities for revision.

Detailed Definition
Peer editing places students in the roles of attentive reader, critic, and developing writer. In a poetry workshop, peers may comment on clarity, imagery, sound, line breaks, structure, emotional effect, and the relationship between a poem’s intentions and its likely reception. Useful feedback is specific, respectful, and grounded in the text rather than simply approving or rejecting a draft. Poetry education includes peer editing because revision benefits from multiple perspectives, and students learn that poems are shaped through dialogue between a writer’s choices and a reader’s experience.
Example
Example in poetry:
During peer editing, students underline the most vivid image in a partner’s poem and explain why it stands out; A peer editing group checks whether a poem’s line breaks support its intended rhythm; Students use peer editing comments to identify places where abstract words could be replaced with concrete details; In peer editing, writers ask questions rather than rewriting a classmate’s poem in their own voice
Additional Notes
Effective peer editing gives the writer usable observations rather than rewriting the poem in another person’s voice. Begin with what is working, identify moments of confusion or strong response, and ask questions about intention. Focus feedback on imagery, sound, line breaks, clarity, and emotional movement; the author decides what to revise.
Also Known As
Collaborative Revision Peer Review Workshop Editing Fellow-Writer Critique
Skip to main content