Conceit Argumentation

Metaphysics
Pronunciation

Understanding ARPABET Pronunciation

Want to hear it? Click the Listen button to hear the browser speak the word using text-to-speech!

The pronunciation guide uses the ARPABET phonetic system—the same system used in speech recognition and text-to-speech applications.

Vowel Examples:
AE1 = cat, bat
EH1 = bed, head
IY1 = see, me
OW1 = go, boat
UW1 = boot, do
Stress Numbers:
0 = no stress (unstressed)
1 = primary stress (loud)
2 = secondary stress (medium)
Example:
AH0 TH IY1 N AH0
= a-THEE-na (Athena)

The stressed syllable (marked with 1) is pronounced louder and clearer than others.

Quick Definition

A conceit constructed as a logical argument with premises, supporting evidence, and conclusions designed to prove an abstract truth or resolve a philosophical paradox through reasoning.

Detailed Definition
Argumentative conceits make poetry itself into philosophy, presenting chains of reasoning about metaphysical questions. This technique transforms the pleasure of poetry into intellectual satisfaction, as readers follow poets' logical paths toward insights about love, mortality, faith, and divinity, experiencing revelation as the inevitable conclusion of rigorous thinking.
Example
Example in poetry:
John Donne’s “The Flea” constructs a logical argument using the flea as evidence of union; Andrew Marvell’s “To His Coy Mistress” argues that time’s brevity necessitates love; George Herbert’s “Love (III)” argues through dialogue that divine love overcomes human unworthiness; Emily Dickinson’s “I’m Nobody! Who are you?” argues for the virtue of anonymity against public fame; T.S. Eliot’s “The Hollow Men” argues that modern souls are paralyzed between intention and action; Sylvia Plath’s “Ariel” argues through imagery that transcendence requires self-annihilation.
Additional Notes
Conceit Argumentation merges poetic form with logical structure, turning the poem into a persuasive proof; metaphysical poets deploy syllogistic reasoning within conceits—Herbert’s “Love (III)” stages a dialectic between unworthy guest and divine host, using dialogue and concession to enact grace as irresistible logic.
Also Known As
Argumentative Conceit Dialectical Conceit Persuasive Conceit
Skip to main content